State of Washington v. Everardo Saucedo Valdez

37631-1Washctapp22 de jun. de 2021

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION THREE
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
EVERARDO SAUCEDO VALDEZ,
Appellant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 37631-1-III
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
STAAB, J. — Everardo Valdez was convicted of felony driving under the
influence. The only issue he raises on appeal is the propriety of a line in the caption of
his judgment and sentence directing “Clerk’s Action” to a later paragraph that did not
apply to his case. Finding no error, we affirm.
Similar to other forms drafted by the Washington State Pattern Forms Committee
and adopted by the Supreme Court, the caption of Mr. Valdez’s judgment and sentence
contained a check box followed by a notation “Clerk’s Action” and a list of paragraphs.
The purpose of this line is to notify court clerks when they need to take action on a
pleading beyond just filing the document.
In Mr. Valdez’s case, the “Clerk’s Action” box was checked in the caption of his
judgment and sentence, followed by a list of paragraphs, including paragraph 5.8.
FILED
JUNE 22, 2021
In the Office of the Clerk of Court
WA State Court of Appeals, Division III
No. 37631-1-III
State v. Valdez
2
Paragraph 5.8 is also in checkbox format, and requires the clerk to notify the Department
of Licensing if the defendant was under the age of 21 at the time of the offense. As Mr.
Valdez notes, this paragraph does not apply in his situation. While this is true, as the
State points out, the check box at paragraph 5.8 was not checked. The list of paragraphs
in the caption tells the clerk which paragraphs may need additional action, but only if the
specific box within the body of the judgment is checked.
In this case, paragraph 5.8 within the judgment was not checked and there is no
indication in the record that the clerk mistakenly notified the Department of Licensing
that Mr. Valdez was convicted of an offense while under the age of 21.
Affirm.
A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW
2.06.040.
_________________________________
Staab, J.
WE CONCUR:
_________________________________
Fearing, J.
_________________________________
Pennell, C.J.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.