State Of Washington, Respondent V. Jacob T. Giedd, Appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION II
STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 54364-8-II
Respondent,
v.
JACOB TODD GIEDD, UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Appellant.
CRUSER, J.—Jacob Todd Giedd appeals his sentence for unlawful possession of a
controlled substance (methamphetamine). Giedd argues, and the State concedes, that he is entitled
to withdraw his plea, or be sentenced under his correct standard range, because his plea agreement
was based on an incorrect standard sentencing range. Since the briefing was completed in this case,
our supreme court issued its decision in State v. Blake, No. 96873-0 (Wash. Feb. 25, 2021),
https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/968730.pdf. In light of the decision in Blake, we remand
this matter to the superior court to address the continued validity of Giedd’s conviction. In light of
our remand, we need not address Giedd’s “Emergency Motion to Vacate Drug Conviction.” This
motion is more properly addressed in the superior court.
CONCLUSION
We remand this matter to the superior court to address the validity of Giedd’s conviction
in light of State v. Blake.
Filed
Washington State
Court of Appeals
Division Two
March 16, 2021

No. 54364-8-II
2
A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW
2.06.040, it is so ordered.
CRUSER, J.
We concur:
WORSWICK, P.J.
GLASGOW, J.