73919-1•State Of Washington, Respondent V. Travis V. Grant, Appellant
State Of Washington, Respondent V. Travis V. Grant, Appellant
73919-1Washctapp23 de jan. de 2017
Texto completo
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. TRAVIS V. GRANT Appellant. DIVISION ONE ^ No. 73919-1-1 ^ UNPUBLISHED OPINION £: FILED: January 23, 2017 Dwyer, J. — The State concedes error in this appeal. We accept the State's concession. The State concedes that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to object to imposition of some of the fees and for failing to inform the court that some of them weren't mandatory upon a showing of indigency. The matter should be remanded for a hearing regarding all legal financial obligations. Br. of Resp't at 2. "Therefore, this matter should be remanded for the court to re-address the imposition of legal financial obligations on both the DUI and felony convictions." Br. of Resp't at 7. We agree. This is the remedy that we afford.
No. 73919-1-1/2 Reversed and remanded. We concur: Q.,j^J^m fyJcet^ 2-
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DIVISION ONE Respondent, No. 73919-1-I oe Vv. UNPUBLISHED OPINION ©: TRAVIS V. GRANT Appellant. FILED: January 23, 2017 we et tell t Dwyer, J. — The State concedes error in this appeal. We accept the State’s concession. The State concedes that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to object to imposition of some of the fees and for failing to inform the court that some of them weren't mandatory upon a showing of indigency. The matter should be remanded for a hearing regarding all legal financial obligations. Br. of Resp’t at 2. “Therefore, this matter should be remanded for the court to re-address the imposition of legal financial obligations on both the DUI and felony convictions.” Br. of Resp’t at 7. We agree. This is the remedy that we afford. No. 73919-1-I/2 Reversed and remanded. We concur: Gein,
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.