Shatrau v. Deml

7ermont Superior Court
Filed 12/11/25
Caledonia nit

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION
Caledonia Unit Case No. 25-CV-02898
1126 Main Street Suite 1
St. Johnsbury VT 05819
802-748-6600
www.vermontjudiciary.org
Eric Shatrau v. Nicholas Deml

ENTRY REGARDING MOTION
Title: Motion to Dismiss (Motion: 2)
Filer: Rebecca J. Ronga
Filed Date: July 18, 2025

In this Rule 74 furlough appeal, appellee Commissioner of the Department of
Corrections (the Department), moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For
the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

The record here demonstrates that appellant Eric Shatrau was released on
community supervision furlough in December 2024 subject to conditions including
Condition 1 ("I will not be cited or charged; I will not commit any act punishable by law,
including city and municipal code violations") and Condition 3 ("I will not engage in
threatening, violent, or assaultive behavior."). On May 4, 2025, the Vermont State Police
received a report that Eric had assaulted another man the previous evening. Following a
brief investigation, Eric was arrested and charged with simple assault. He was lodged and
received a notice of suspension report alleging that he had violated Conditions 1 and 3.
Following a contested hearing on May 8 at which Eric appeared and was represented by a
hearing assistant, Eric was found guilty of both violations. With respect to Condition 1, the
hearing officer found that Eric was "charged with simple assault," and with respect to
Condition 3, the hearing officer found that "[e]ngaging in simple assault is engaging in
threatening behavior." Agency Record (AR 25). In other words, the hearing officer made a
factual finding based on the evidence presented at the hearing that Eric had violated
Condition 3 by committing a simple assault. Following a June 18, 2025 case staffing, the
Department interrupted Eric's furlough for one year.
The Department argues the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because Eric's
furlough violations were not "technical" violations and therefore do not fall within the ambit
of Rule 74. See 28 V.S.A. § 724(c)(1) ("An offender whose community supervision furlough
status is revoked or interrupted for 90 days or longer for a technical violation shall have the
right to appeal the Department's determination to the Civil Division of the Superior Court
in accordance with Rule 74 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure." (emphasis added)). By
statute, a "t]echnical violation" means a violation of conditions of furlough that does not
constitute a new crime." 28 V.S.A. § 722(4).
On the facts presented here, where Eric was criminally charged with simple assault,
and a hearing officer has made a factual determination following a contested hearing that
Eric engaged in the charged conduct, the court concludes, by a preponderance of evidence,
that appellant’s furlough was suspended for a violation that constitutes a new crime. See 28
V.S.A. § 722(4); 724(c)(1). The court accordingly lacks subject matter to consider the
appeal. 1
Order
The motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

Electronically signed on: 12/10/2025 pursuant to V.R.E.F. 9(d)

_______________________________________
Benjamin D. Battles
Superior Court Judge

1 Because the court resolves the motion on this basis, it does not consider the plea agreement filed in

the criminal case.