Paul Zapata, Jr. v. the State of Texas

COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS

PAUL ZAPATA, JR., § No. 08-25-00025-CR
Appellant,
§ Appeal from the
v.
§ 421st District Court
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee. § of Caldwell County, Texas

§ (TC#22-238)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction due to an untimely perfection of the appeal.

On November 29, 2024, Appellant Paul Zapata filed a notice of appeal in the trial court,

wherein he attempted to appeal from a judgment of conviction finding him guilty of possession

of a firearm by a felon.1 Weeks later, on December 4, 2024, Zapata filed in the trial court a

pleading titled, “corrected motion for new trial,” which include no reference to a preceding

motion. Zapata’s filings call into question the court’s jurisdiction over the appeal.

1
This appeal was transferred to this Court from the Third Court of Appeals pursuant to a Texas Supreme Court
docket equalization order. Accordingly, we apply the Third Court of Appeals’ precedent to the extent it conflicts with
our own. See Tex. R. App. P. 41.3.
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’s jurisdiction. Taylor v.

State, 424 S.W.3d 39, 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). In a criminal case, a notice of appeal by a

defendant must be filed within 30 days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court,

or after the date the trial court enters an appealable order; or within 90 days after the day

sentence is imposed or suspended in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new

trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1) and (2). To be considered timely, a motion for new trial must be

filed no later than 30 days after the date sentence is imposed. Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a). A

defendant who wishes to amend a motion for new trial, may do so without leave of court, within

30 days of the date sentence is imposed, if the court has not overruled any preceding motion for

new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(b). A trial court must rule on a motion for new trial within 75 days

after imposing or suspending sentence in open court. Tex. R. App. P. 21.8 (a). If not timely ruled

on by written order, the motion is deemed denied when the 75-day period prescribed by Rule

21.8 (a) expires. Tex. R. App. P. 21.8(c).

Here, Zapata’s notice of appeal states that sentence was imposed on November 26, 2024.

However, the judgment of conviction indicates on its face that sentence was imposed on March

20, 2024. Calculating the deadline for perfecting the appeal using the judgment date of March

20, 2024, Zapata’s notice of appeal was due either on April 19, 2024, if no motion for new trial

was filed, or June 18, 2024, if a motion for new trial was timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2.

The district clerk’s information sheet indicates that no motion for new trial was filed in the trial

court. Consistent with that record, no motion for new trial preceding the “corrected motion for

new trial” filed on December 4, 2024 is referenced. Thus, the motion of December 4, 2024, was

untimely filed more than 30 days after the judgment of March 20, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P.

21.4(a). Because no timely motion for new trial was filed, the notice of appeal was due no later

2
than April 19, 2024. However, Zapata filed his notice of appeal on November 29, 2024, or

months after the filing deadline.

By letter dated January 9, 2025, the Clerk of this Court notified Zapata that his appeal

appeared to be untimely filed. The letter admonished Zapata that his appeal would be dismissed

after 20 days, unless grounds were shown for the Court to continue the appeal. Despite the

Clerk’s notice, Zapata has failed to respond to the Court’s jurisdictional inquiry. Because it

appears this appeal was not timely perfected, and no grounds have been shown for continuing the

appeal and required notice has been given, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.

P. 26.2 (providing deadlines for perfecting a criminal appeal), 43.2(f) (authorizing dismissal of

an appeal).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

February 7, 2025
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)

3