Matthew Riddle v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10783629Txctapp630 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

In the
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-25-00089-CR

MATTHEW RIDDLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 202nd District Court
Bowie County, Texas
Trial Court No. 24F0337-202

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens
MEMORANDUM OPINION

A Bowie County jury convicted Matthew Riddle of child grooming and assessed a

punishment of ten years’ imprisonment with a $10,000.00 fine. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN.

§ 15.032 (Supp.). Riddle appeals from this conviction, as well as another conviction for child

grooming in his companion appellate case numbered 06-25-00088-CR and a conviction for

online solicitation of a minor in companion appellate case number 06-25-00090-CR. See id.;

TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 33.021 (Supp.).

Riddle’s appeal in this case raises the same issue raised in his appeal from 06-25-00088-

CR. Specifically, Riddle argues that Section “15.032 is unconstitutional and [the] indictment[]

under that statute should be dismissed because [it] violate[s] the first amendment [sic] and [is]

vague and overbroad.” For the same reasons discussed in 06-25-00088-CR, we overrule

Riddle’s point of error as inadequately briefed.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Scott E. Stevens
Chief Justice

Date Submitted: January 29, 2026
Date Decided: January 30, 2026

Do Not Publish

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.