CourtListener 9509626•In Re: William Michael Talley v. the State of Texas
In Re: William Michael Talley v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 9509626Txctapp1231 de mai. de 2024
Texto completo
NO. 12-24-00071-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
IN RE: §
WILLIAM MICHAEL TALLEY, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
William Michael Talley, acting pro se, filed this original proceeding to challenge
Respondent’s failure to rule on his motions for discovery control plan, change of venue, and
recusal. 1 Relator filed a notice of withdrawal, in which he asks this Court to take no further
action in this proceeding. We construe this notice as a motion to dismiss. Accordingly,
we grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(1).
Opinion delivered May 31, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
1
Respondent is the Honorable Jerald (Dean) Fowler, II, Judge of the 115th District Court in Upshur
County, Texas. Kenneth Ray Woolf, Michael Blake Talley, and Tracy Elizabeth Talley are the Real Parties in
Interest.
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
MAY 31, 2024
NO. 12-24-00071-CV
WILLIAM MICHAEL TALLEY,
Relator
V.
HON. JERALD (DEAN) FOWLER II,
Respondent
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ON THIS DAY came to be heard the motion to dismiss the petition for writ of
mandamus filed by William Michael Talley; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-24-
00071-CV and a party to trial court cause number 506-23, pending on the docket of the 115th
Judicial District Court of Upshur County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having
been filed herein on April 1, 2024, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the
opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED
and ORDERED that the said motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus be, and the
same is, hereby granted and this proceeding is dismissed.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.