CourtListener 10873066•State v. Seuvarrggio S. Rector
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Seuvarrggio Senwuez Rector, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-001513
Appeal From Greenville County
Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-290
Submitted May 1, 2026 – Filed June 10, 2026
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of
Columbia, and Seuvarrggio Senwuez Rector, pro se, both
for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia; and Solicitor Cynthia Smith Crick, of
Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
GEATHERS, HEWITT, and CURTIS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.