State v. Earl Valentine, Jr.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Earl Eugene Valentine, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2024-000877

Appeal From Saluda County
Debra R. McCaslin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-200
Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 6, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, and Earl Eugene Valentine, Jr., pro se, both
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory and Senior Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of
Columbia; and Solicitor Samuel R. Hubbard, III, of
Lexington, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.