CourtListener 10632557•SCDSS v. Jimmie Hankins
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Lisa Farmer and Jimmie Hankins, Defendants,
Of whom Jimmie Hankins is the Appellant
and
Lisa Farmer is a Respondent.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2024-002068
Appeal From Anderson County
David E. Phillips, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-246
Submitted July 10, 2025 – Filed July 14, 2025
AFFIRMED
Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.
Nima Fiuzat, of Clemson, for Respondent Lisa Farmer.
Kimberly Welchel Pease, of Kimberly Welchel Pease,
Attorney at Law, of Seneca, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Jimmie Hankins appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2024). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Hankins's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1
KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and VINSON, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.