State v. Vincent Dwight (2)

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Vincent Dwight, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2024-000522

Appeal From Orangeburg County
Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-202
Submitted June 20, 2025 – Filed June 25, 2025

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and GEATHERS and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.