CourtListener 10156179•State v. Abney
Texto completo
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Ted Edward
Abney, Appellant.
Appeal From Newberry County
Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-184
Submitted March 3, 2008 Filed March 17,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Jerry W. Peace, of Greenwood, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Ted
Edward Abney (Appellant) was convicted of armed robbery and was sentenced to
twenty-six years in prison. On appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed a final
brief along with a petition to be relieved as counsel. Appellant has not filed
a pro se response. After a thorough review of the record
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]
HUFF, KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] This case is decided without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.