State v. Atkinson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Linda Michelle
Atkinson, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-180

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 17,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Linda Michelle Atkinson appeals her
probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking thirty months
of her probation because there was insufficient evidence to support a finding she
violated the terms of her probation.  Atkinson’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved, stating he
reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Atkinson did not
file a pro se brief.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Atkinson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF,
KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.