State v. Rhinehardt

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Phillip
Rhinehardt, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 Roger L. Couch , Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-190

Submitted March 4, 2008 – Filed March 18,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Phillip Rhinehardt appeals his guilty
plea to first-degree criminal sexual conduct.  On appeal, Rhinehardt maintains
his guilty plea failed to conform to the mandates set forth in Boykin v.
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Rhinehardt’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON , SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.