CourtListener 10156104•State v. Smith
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT
SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Curtis Smith, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-456
Submitted August 1, 2008 Filed August 7,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General, John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Curtis
Smith appeals his guilty plea to second degree criminal sexual conduct with a
minor. The plea judge sentenced Smith to eight years for the charge. Smith argues
the plea judge erred in accepting his guilty plea before advising him of his
right to confront witnesses or obtaining a waiver from Smith of that right. After a thorough
review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), we dismiss[1] Smiths appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.