State v. Williams

CourtListener 10156067Scctapp18 de ago. de 2008

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Bernard
Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-493

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August
18, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Kenneth
Bernard Williams appeals his guilty pleas to two counts of grand larceny; two
counts of third degree burglary, second offense; receiving stolen goods; and
resisting arrest.  Williams argues the trial court erred by accepting his guilty
plea because his plea was not knowingly and intelligently made.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Williams’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

KONDUROS,
J., CURETON, and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.