CourtListener 10156059•State v. Charles Hagwood, Jr.
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.,
Charles
Hagwood, Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From York County
Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-580
Submitted November 2, 2009 Filed
December 3, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York;
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Charles Hagwood, Jr., appeals from his guilty plea to distribution of
marijuana, and trafficking cocaine in an amount greater than twenty-eight grams
but less than one-hundred grams, arguing the plea court failed to inform him
that during trial, he would have the right to challenge the admission of a
statement made to police. Hagwood filed a separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and both
briefs, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.