State v. Eric Scott

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eric Lorenzo Scott, Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-571

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
December 3, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle DuRant, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Jay  Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Eric Lorenzo Scott appeals from his guilty plea to possession with
intent to distribute marijuana, two counts of possession with intent to
distribute crack cocaine, distribution of crack cocaine, distribution of crack
cocaine within one-half mile of a school, and failure to stop for a blue
light.  Scott argues the plea court failed to conform with the mandates set
forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and brief,
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.