State v. Stacey E. Lingerfelt

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Stacey E. Lingerfelt, Appellant.

Appeal From Cherokee County

J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-613

Submitted December 1, 2009 – Filed
December 22, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Stacey E. Lingerfelt appeals the
revocation of her probation, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking her
probation because her probation had already terminated upon full payment of
restitution in accordance with the sentencing court's order.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Lingerfelt's appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.