State v. Bryan Hackett

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bryan Orlando Hackett, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenwood County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-532

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 19, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Bryan
Orlando Hackett appeals his probation revocation and resulting concurrent two-year
sentences.  Hackett argues the probation revocation was so summary that the
record is insufficient for review.    After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Hackett's
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.