State v. Neely

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Anterrance S. Neely, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-555

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 19, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Anterrance
Neely appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing the circuit court erred
by revoking his probation rather than ordering out-patient drug treatment and
continued community supervision.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., Huff, and Geathers, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.