State v. Gomillion

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ravenel
Gomillion, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-547

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 20, 2009 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R Morgan, of Aiken, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Ravenel Gomillion appeals his guilty plea to criminal domestic violence of a
high and aggravated nature and ten-year sentence.  Gomillion's counsel filed a
brief, arguing the trial court erred in basing
Gomillion's sentence upon the fact that he was on probation for a prior
conviction without knowledge of the facts surrounding the probation sentence.  Gomillion
filed a pro se brief reasserting counsel's briefed argument.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HEARN, C.J., Huff,
and Geathers, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.