State v. Glover

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Martin Glover, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-442

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
October 1, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Alpin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Martin Glover appeals the revocation of his
probation.  Glover argues the probation revocation hearing is too summary for
appellate review.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Glover's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.