State v. Mobley

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James E.
Mobley, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-450

Submitted September 1, 2009- Filed October
7, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
James E. Mobley appeals his conviction for distribution of crack cocaine, third
offense.  Mobley asserts the trial court's charge on reasonable doubt lessened
the State's burden of proof.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Mobley's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

Short, Williams,
and Geathers, J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.