State v. Richard Lee Davis

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Richard Lee
Davis, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-452

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
8, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Richard Lee Davis appeals the revocation of his probation.  Davis argues
the probation revocation hearing is too summary for appellate review.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ, concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.