CourtListener 10155919•State v. Freeman
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Steven Joel Freeman, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-477
Submitted October 1, 2009 Filed October
13, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J.
Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Steven Joel Freeman appeals his guilty pleas to murder,
first-degree burglary, and resisting arrest. Freeman argues the trial court
erred by accepting his pleas because they did not comply with Boykin v.
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). Freeman also filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and both
briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
Huff, Thomas, and Pieper, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.