State v. Chadwick Plumley

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Chadwick
Plumley, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-494

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
21, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Chadwick Plumley appeals his guilty pleas for two counts of first-degree burglary, obtaining property by false
pretenses, and grand larceny.  On appeal, he argues the plea court erred in
failing to hold a restitution hearing.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.