State v. Ronald Wood

CourtListener 10155897Scctapp21 de out. de 2009

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ronald Wood, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-492

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
21, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia,  for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of
Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ronald
Wood pled guilty to first-degree burglary and was sentenced to fifteen years'
incarceration.  Wood asserts the trial court erred by accepting his plea
because it did not comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama,
395 U.S. 238 (1969).  Wood filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and both
briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.