State v. Wilson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,  Respondent,

v.

Glen Wilson, Appellant.

Appeal From Williamsburg County

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-433

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
September 9, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and  Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Glen Wilson appeals his convictions for murder,
assault and battery with intent to kill, possession of a deadly weapon during the
commission of a violent crime, armed robbery, and criminal conspiracy.  Wilson
argues the trial court erred in allowing the surviving victim to testify that
Wilson was "playing his rough role . . . like he's done it before,"
as this testimony tended to place Wilson's character in issue in violation of
Rules 403 and 404, SCRE.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HUFF,
THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.