SCDSS v. Tina H.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

   v.

Tina H., Robert
H., Anthony R., and Daniel R.  Defendants,

Of Whom Tina H.
and Anthony R. are the Appellants.

In the
interest of three minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Greenville County

Timothy L. Brown, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-400

Submitted July 1, 2009 – Filed August 5,
2009  

AFFIRMED

W. Wallace Culp, III, and Charles B. Bowen, Jr., of Greenville,
for Appellants.

Deborah Murdock, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Robert Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian Ad Litem. 

PER CURIAM: Tina
H. and Anthony R. appeal from the family
court's order removing three minor children from their custody.  S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-1660 (Supp. 2008). 
Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact
and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN,
C.J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.