SCDSS v. Kelley S.

CourtListener 10155845Scctapp19 de ago. de 2009

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Kelley S. and
Wade S., III, Defendants,

of whom Kelley
S. is the Appellant.

In the Interest of: E.R.H.

and J.D.B., both minor

children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Barnwell County

R. Kinard Johnson, Jr., Family Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-404

Submitted August 1, 2009 – Filed August
19, 2009   

AFFIRMED

Mitchell Jerry Williams, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Amanda Frances Whittle, of Aiken, for Respondent.

Patrick  McWilliams, of Aiken, for Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Kelley
S. appeals from the family court’s order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2008).  Upon a thorough review of the
record and the family court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant
to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no
meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court’s
ruling.  

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN,
C.J., KONDUROS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.