CourtListener 10155739•State v. Ashley
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jonathan Ross Ashley, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-355
Submitted June 1, 2009 Filed June 23,
2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Assistant Chief Legal Counsel John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Ross Ashley appeals the
revocation of his probation, arguing trial court erred in giving decisive
weight to the statement of the victim without a full evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Ashley's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.