CourtListener 10155711•State v. Belk
Texto completo
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jerry Belk, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-380
Submitted June 1, 2009 Filed June 30,
2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jerry
Belk appeals his guilty pleas for two
counts of auto breaking and two counts of property offenses, third offenses. On appeal, Belk's counsel alleges the trial court erred in accepting his plea without
first receiving a factual basis for the pleas. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.