State v. Highfill

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Charles
Highfill, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

 Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-234

Submitted May 1, 2009 – Filed May 27, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Charles
Highfill appeals his guilty plea and sentence possession of crack cocaine,
arguing an insufficient factual basis for his plea existed.  Highfill filed a
separate pro se brief.  After
a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and the pro se brief, pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.