State v. Josey

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Christopher
Josey a/k/a Christopher Choice, Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

 George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-127

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 5, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney Generarl John W. McIntosh,

Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of
Columbia; Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Christopher Josey appeals his guilty pleas and sentences for strong arm
robbery, assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, and first-degree
burglary.   He argues the trial judge erred in imposing restitution which was
not included as part of his negotiated sentence.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief, pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be
relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

Short, Thomas, and Geathers, jj.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.