State v. Snyder

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Eugene Snyder, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-119

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 5, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: James
Eugene Snyder appeals his guilty plea and sentences for forgery, possession of
crack cocaine, and two counts of financial transaction card fraud.  He argues
his guilty plea failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v.
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF,
WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.