State v. Chapman

CourtListener 10155565Scctapp30 de mar. de 2009

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.,

Ashley Olivia
Chapman, Appellant.

Appeal from York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-155

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 30,
2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Ashley Olivia Chapman appeals her
probation revocation, arguing the probation court erred in revoking her
probation in full because the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon
Services delayed service of her probation violation arrest warrant for eight
months.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
PIEPER and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.