State v. Malloy

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Keith Antonio
Malloy, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-659

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 4, 2008 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keith Antonio Malloy appeals his probation revocation,
arguing the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his suspended
sentence.    After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Malloy’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.