State v. Ray

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Shelton Darnell Ray, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Michelle J. Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-661

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 4, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Shelton Darnell Ray
appeals his guilty plea to use of a vehicle without consent and sentence of
time served.  Ray argues the trial court erred by not insuring his plea
complied with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395
U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.