State v. Mitchell

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Larry Mitchell,
Jr., Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-674

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 9, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Larry Mitchell, Jr. appeals his guilty plea to
criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature.  Mitchell argues
the trial court erred by accepting his guilty plea without explaining and
obtaining a waiver of his right of confrontation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Mitchell’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HEARN, C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.