State v. Byrd

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Natalie  Byrd, Appellant.

Appeal From Pickens County

 J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-696

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 15, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of
Greenville, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Natalie Byrd appeals her concurrent sentence of five
years and one year for failure to return rental property and financial
transaction card fraud.  She maintains the trial court erred in refusing to
consider house arrest as an alternative to prison time.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and Byrd’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Byrd’s appeal and grant
counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.