State v. Shumate

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Avis Shumate, Appellant.

Appeal From Laurens County

 William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-505

Submitted September 2, 2008 – Filed
September 5, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Avis Shumate appeals her probation
revocation, arguing the trial court erred
in revoking her probation because insufficient evidence supported finding she violated the conditions of
her probation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Shumate’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.