State v. Woods

CourtListener 10155242Scctapp16 de set. de 2008

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Anthony Woods, Appellant.

Appeal From Clarendon County

 Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-536

Submitted September 2, 2008 – Filed September 16, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott;  all of Columbia, and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter; for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Anthony Woods was convicted of (1) burglary in the first degree,
(2) assault and battery with the intent to kill, and (3) criminal sexual
conduct in the first degree.  He received consecutive sentences of life in
prison, twenty-years, and thirty-years, respectively.  Woods appeals his
convictions, arguing the trial court erred by failing to suppress physical
evidence sized from his residence.  In his pro se brief, Woods also argues the
trial court erred by denying defense counsel’s motion for a mistrial.  After a
thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Woods’ pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Woods’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.