CourtListener 10155236•State v. Welsh
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lewis Welsh,
a/k/a Lewis
Welch, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-537
Submitted September 2, 2008 Filed
September 17, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Robert M. Dudek, Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott;
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Lewis Welsh appeals his conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine, arguing the circuit court
erred in admitting a police officers testimony that Welsh had offered to sell
him drugs a few days before the offense for which Welsh was charged. After a
thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Welshs appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.