Charleston County DSS v. Micah Q.

CourtListener 10155233Scctapp29 de set. de 2008

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Charleston
County Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Krystal H.,
Micah Q. and John Doe, Defendants,

Of Whom Micah Q.
is the Appellant.

In the interest of S.H., a child under the
age of 18.

Appeal From Charleston County

Judy Bridges McMahon, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-544

Submitted September 1, 2008 – Filed
September 29, 2008  

AFFIRMED

Ellen H. Bentz, of Charleston, for Appellant.

Bonnie T Brisbane, of North Charleston, for Respondent.

Suzanne E. Groff, of Charleston, for Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Micah
Q. appeals from the family court’s order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 20-7-1572 (Supp. 2007).  Upon a thorough review
of the record and the family court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law,
pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we
find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family
court’s ruling and relieve counsel.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1]  We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.