State v. Bunn

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bradley Bunn, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-363

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 11,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Robert M. Dudek, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of
Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan,  of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Bradley Bunn pleaded guilty to four counts of armed
robbery and one count of use of an automobile without the owner’s permission.  Bunn
appeals, arguing his guilty plea does not comply with Boykin v. Alabama,
395 U.S. 238 (1969), because the circuit court erred in failing to advise him
of his privilege against self-incrimination, right to trial by jury, and right
to confront his accusers.  Bunn did not file a separate pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Bunn’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J. concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.