CourtListener 10155115•State v. Johnson
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Rashine Johnson, Appellant.
Appeal From Bamburg County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-373
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 11,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan of Aiken, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM:
Rashine Johnson appeals his guilty plea to
assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. On appeal, Johnson
maintains his guilty plea failed to conform with the mandates set forth in Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After
a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Johnsons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.