CourtListener 10155104•State v. Walker
Texto completo
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Marvin Walker, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-384
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 14,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Walker appeals his guilty plea of two counts of armed robbery. On appeal, Walkers counsel alleges the plea did not meet the
mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Walkers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.