State v. Coakley

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Isaac Coakley, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-421

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 21,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office
of the Attorney General; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Isaac Coakley appeals his guilty plea to second degree
burglary and shoplifting third offense and subsequent sentence of eight years
imprisonment.  He maintains his guilty plea failed to conform with the mandates
set forth in Boykin v. Alabama because the plea court failed to
adequately inform him of the constitutional rights he waived by entering a
guilty plea.  395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
Coakley’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.