CourtListener 10154967•Sabb v. State
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In the Court of Appeals
Bobby A. Sabb, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal from Clarendon County
Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Paula H. Thomas, Post-Conviction Relief Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-276
Submitted April 1, 2008 Filed May 22, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney
General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney John W. McIntosh, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Lance
Boozer, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from
the denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR).
Because
there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judges finding that
Petitioner is entitled to a belated appeal, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and proceed with a
review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C.
290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986).
After
a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Petitioners appeal. Counsels motion to be relieved
is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, KITTREDGE,
and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.